Please Stop Saying “Stop the Violence”

I don’t want to sound under-appreciative of all of the people who are calling for an end to the violence, it’s just that I’ve never seen “Stop the _________” actually, well, stop anything. It doesn’t work, because you are not trying to fix a cause, you are trying to stem a reaction to a cause. Once someone looses their cool and becomes irrational, by definition, you cannot reason with them.

The only bigger fantasy is expecting them to reason with themselves in this state. “Stop the anger” is maybe closer… but ultimately that also doesn’t involve stopping something so much as starting something. It means seeking to understand why people do the things they do and addressing that, rather than simply expecting them to stop responding to stimuli because you said so. It means using the groups and labels, that we as a society are so fond of assigning, as a means of bridging gaps rather than highlighting differences and adding more “gape” the the already sizable “maw.”

Here’s the thing, the shooter in Dallas didn’t open fire on those police officers because of what they were doing, he opened fire on them because of what they looked like. They represented an easily identifiable group toward which the shooter held particularly strong feelings… they were merely symbolic of the actual target of his rage. If that sounds familiar, it should, because it is among the leading causes of friction in our society. Without this type of group association, for example, Philando Castile and Corey Jones – along with those officers in Dallas – might still be alive today.

With all due respect, “stop the violence” is ultimately a lazy approach to a real problem and a non-starter as a solution. It’s a placebo that lets people feel like they are doing something, when they simply aren’t. It’s kind of like trying to make your first million (or achieve world peace, or whatever) by blowing out the candles on your birthday cake.

Again, while I appreciate the sentiment, it is powerless and ineffectual. If you want to actually do something to reduce (or stop) the violence, start having honest, candid, and objective conversations about why police feel more threatened by an African-American man than they do by others in the same situations; and then asking “what can be done about that?” Apply the five-whys-to-be-wise approach and keep asking why until you get to the actual root cause, rather than the simple answer that is often a symptom, not the disease.

I want to be clear about this, I’m not talking about being less engaged… I’m not telling anyone to stop doing anything (other than stringing three meaningless words together). I’m asking everyone to take more action, to be responsible for what is going on around them in their own country and community. Further, I’m asking people to do so in a substantive way… a way that can actually make a difference. If you really care, and I believe each and every one of you do, stop throwing lip service at the problem, get your hands (minds?) dirty, and start working toward a solution.

Or, I guess, keep enjoying the ignorant bliss of your birthday cake… over and over again… for all that’s worth.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Idiocracy – Life Imitates Art

The President of the United States is the final and ultimate arbiter of decisions we make as a nation.  He or she is the “here” at which the buck stops; and the repercussions – good or bad – for our actions as a nation begin.  They are the person with the power to put nations at war (in both conventional and nuclear terms), to shape the economy, to influence how we carry on our daily lives as a society, and considerably more.  Given all of this, I do not understand why we would want a serial failure – both in business and in his personal life – to be that person.

I’m not saying I’m better than Donald Trump (I might be, I might not be… odds are I am in some ways and not so much in others), but I am willing to say (and don’t feel that I’m reaching at all to do so) that there are candidates on both sides of the isle that are.  Candidates that haven’t given it the old college try four (4) times to select a political party, three (3) times to get married, and five (5) times taken stabs at running his business without self-created debt from overextending his assets (post 4 bankruptcy’s).

Normally, I don’t like to take shots at people, I prefer to talk about the benefits of a different candidate and let those inherent qualifications take the day.  But, somehow, this man who has suggested religious screening in the land of the free and the home of the brave, who has suggested that our next door neighbor “sends us” their murders, rapists, etc., who has stated that he could shoot someone in the middle of the street and not lose votes, who has just recently advocated for bringing back water-boarding and other “enhanced interrogation techniques” (asked, in reference to beheadings, “Do we win by being more like them?” Trump replied “Yes, I’m sorry. You have to do it that way.”), who has advocated occupying sovereign nations and taking their natural resources (to pay, in part, for our military), who has said these things and so many others… this man is leading the polls.  And, as such, I feel compelled to ask America, what the fuck it is thinking.

trump idiocracy

I get the idea of wanting change, of wanting something different than what we are getting from Washington.  What I refuse to believe is that hundreds of thousands (perhaps even millions) of Americans are ignorant enough to think changing the people within the broken system is going to bring about that change.  Sure, a few knuckleheaded, lazy, unread idiots who didn’t (don’t) care enough about their own knowledge base to understand how government works might slip through the cracks of common sense, but hundreds of thousands of people (perhaps even millions)… are you kidding me?  If this is really true, then, collectively, we are too stupid to be allowed behind the wheel of the most powerful nation on Earth.

From a “change” standpoint, it doesn’t matter who you put in the various offices in Washington DC.  No outsider (or insider) is going to change the culture of a system that is entrenched and self-protecting, that takes the will of the people.  A clear majority of the people united (usually across party – or other, e.g. gender in the suffrage movement – lines) toward the improvements they want to see is what drives systemic change.  Any source of historical information will validate this for you if you are not inclined to take my word for it.

In other words, Donald Trump (much like Donald Duck, Sarah Palin, Sarah Connor (yes, the one from Terminator), and other equally realistic candidates for President) cannot make things better just because he has not been chewed up and spit out by the social/political/economic machine that is DC politics.  His inexperience within the system offers nothing but an ignorant approach to an ongoing issue.  It’s like replacing the starting quarterback on an NFL team with the local sports radio talk show host because you don’t like the play calling and the effort of the offensive line.  Same bad play calling, same ineffective offensive line, new – completely inept – quarterback… what could go wrong???

That is the scenario we are facing during the primary season (and potentially in the general election this fall).  Clearly, our QB is retiring and we need someone new to run the team.  Obviously, we all seem to agree that the playbook and supporting players leave a little to be desired.  The question is, given these deficiencies (which are not going anywhere any time soon), do we want a qualified, experienced QB, or a guy who’s last completion came in the family Turkey Bowl a few years back (if even then)?  The answer is glaringly obvious… wake up America, and get busy scouring the free-agent wire for the best option, rather than simply looking for something different.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment